Validación de un ensayo inmunoenzimático tipo ELISA para cuantificar niveles de antitoxina diftérica en suero humano / Validation of an ELISA-type immune-enzymatic test to quantify levels of diphtheria antitoxin in human serum

Introducción: La difteria aún persiste en numerosos países. En Cuba, estudios realizados en diferentes grupos etarios han demostrado que existen niveles no protectores de antitoxina diftérica en la población, por lo que es necesario contar con métodos que permitan la estimación serológica de la inmunidad poblacional. La cuantificación de anticuerpos contra antígenos vacunales como la toxina diftérica es además un método útil, rápido y económico para evaluar la respuesta inmune. Objetivo: Validar un ensayo inmunoenzimático tipo ELISA para cuantificar los niveles de antitoxina diftérica en suero humano. Material y Método: Se realizó un estudio experimental de desarrollo tecnológico, en el cual se determinaron los valores óptimos de las variables que influyen en el resultado de un ensayo inmunoenzimático heterogéneo indirecto para la cuantificación de antitoxina diftérica, desarrollado en el laboratorio de Inmunología del Centro Nacional de Genética Médica de Cuba. La curva de calibración se evaluó contra el estándar de la OMS (Diphtheria Antitoxin Human Serum 00/496). Se realizó la validación analítica del método estandarizado. Resultados: Los coeficientes de variación intraensayo e interensayo fueron inferiores a 10 por ciento y 20 por ciento, respectivamente. En la exactitud y selectividad se encontraron valores de recobrado entre 90 y 110 por ciento. El paralelismo entre la curva estándar y las muestras estudiadas presentó un coeficiente de variación menor o igual a 10 por ciento. El límite de cuantificación fue 0,015 UI/mL y el de detección 0,0039 UI/mL. Conclusiones: El resultado obtenido en la precisión, exactitud y selectividad del ensayo inmunoenzimático tipo ELISA desarrollado demostró que puede ser utilizado en la práctica clínica para cuantificar los valores de antitoxina diftérica en suero humano(AU)

Introduction: Diphtheria still persists in many countries. In Cuba, studies conducted in different age groups have demonstrated that there are non-protective levels of diphtheria antitoxin in the population, so it is necessary to have methods that allow the serologic survey of population immunity. The quantification of antibodies against vaccine antigens such as diphtheria toxin is also a useful, rapid and economic method to evaluate the immune response. Objective: To validate an ELISA-type immune-enzymatic test to quantify the levels of diphtheria antitoxin in human serum. Material and Method: An experimental study of technological development was carried out in the Immunology Laboratory of the National Medical Genetics Center, Havana, Cuba. The optimal values ​​of the variables that influence on the result of the indirect heterogeneous immune-enzymatic test for the quantification of diphtheria antitoxin were determined. The calibration curve obtained was evaluated against the WHO standard (Diphtheria Antitoxin Human Serum 00/496). The analytical validation of the standardized method was performed. Results: The intra-assay and inter-assay coefficients of variation were less than 10 percent and 20 percent, respectively. Recovery values ​​between 90 and 110% were found in accuracy and selectivity. The parallelism between the standard curve and the samples studied showed a coefficient of variation lower or equal to 10 percent. The limit of quantification was 0,015 IU/mL and the one of detection was 0,0039 IU/mL. Conclusions: The result obtained in the precision, accuracy and selectivity of the ELISA-type immune-enzymatic test developed and validated in the National Medical Genetics Center demonstrated that it can be used in the clinical practice to quantify the values ​​of diphtheria antitoxin in human serum(AU)

Seroprevalence of antibody against diphtheria among the population in Khon Kaen province, Thailand.

To assess diphtheria immunity in the northeastern region of Thailand, a seroepidemiological survey was undertaken in 2011 from 516 healthy individuals (age range 2-87 years) in Khon Kaen province. Diphtheria antitoxin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and titers of ≥0.1 IU/mL were considered to be protective antitoxin levels. Among the studied population, 94.8% have fully protective levels. The younger population (age range 2-19 years) has higher diphtheria immunity with seroprotection rates of 96.8% to 97.9%, compared with the adult population. The proportion of protective diphtheria antitoxin levels declines to 88.3% to 91.9% in the middle-aged group (20-50 years), and appeared to be higher again in the older age-group (50-70 years). To avoid epidemic spreading, promoting immunization booster programs will be helpful, especially among the adult population (20-50 years). Finally, this study may serve as a valuable guide in deciding exactly which age-groups should be targeted by such an effort.

Primer caso de difteria en España después de 30 años. Lecciones aprendidas / No disponible

No disponible

Standardization and validation of Vero cell assay for potency estimation of diphtheria antitoxin serum.

Diphtheria toxin has the capacity to block protein synthesis in cultured mammalian cells, and thus causing cell death. This capacity of diphtheria toxin was utilized for in-vitro neutralization test to determine antibody titer, using Vero cells, which have been found to be susceptible to diphtheria toxin. In the present study, a Vero cell assay was standardized and validated for potency estimation of diphtheria antitoxin serum (DATS). The results obtained by Vero cell assay were compared with in-vivo biological assay. High degree of correlation (+0.98) was found between in-vivo biological assay and in-vitro Vero cell assay. The assay has also been found to be effective in determining the rising antibody titer in the equines inducted in DATS production. The present study indicated that although biological assays hold the key for final potency estimations till date but in the future scenario in-vitro Vero cell assay may be a good alternative to in-vivo biological assay.

[Study of diphtheria anatoxins in immunochemical and tissue culture assays].

Equine diphtheria antitoxins from different manufacturers were studied. Their immunochemical interaction with diphtheria toxin, toxoid, and antigens of Corynebacterium diphtheriae in ELISA and immunoblotting assays as well as biological activity in CHO cell assay were compared. The discovered differences between antitoxin samples with stated equal activity in IU/ml point to heterogeneity of antigen composition in preparations used for immunization. Mentioned methods allow to standardize antitoxins basing on their biological activity and immunochemical characteristics.

Determination of low tetanus or diphtheria antitoxin titers in sera by a toxin neutralization assay and a modified toxin-binding inhibition test

A method for the screening of tetanus and diphtheria antibodies in serum using anatoxin (inactivated toxin) instead of toxin was developed as an alternative to the in vivo toxin neutralization assay based on the toxin-binding inhibition test (TOBI test). In this study, the serum titers (values between 1.0 and 19.5 IU) measured by a modified TOBI test (Modi-TOBI test) and toxin neutralization assays were correlated (P < 0.0001). Titers of tetanus or diphtheria antibodies were evaluated in serum samples from guinea pigs immunized with tetanus toxoid, diphtheria-tetanus or triple vaccine. For the Modi-TOBI test, after blocking the microtiter plates, standard tetanus or diphtheria antitoxin and different concentrations of guinea pig sera were incubated with the respective anatoxin. Twelve hours later, these samples were transferred to a plate previously coated with tetanus or diphtheria antitoxin to bind the remaining anatoxin. The anatoxin was then detected using a peroxidase-labeled tetanus or diphtheria antitoxin. Serum titers were calculated using a linear regression plot of the results for the corresponding standard antitoxin. For the toxin neutralization assay, L+/10/50 doses of either toxin combined with different concentrations of serum samples were inoculated into mice for anti-tetanus detection, or in guinea pigs for anti-diphtheria detection. Both assays were suitable for determining wide ranges of antitoxin levels. The linear regression plots showed high correlation coefficients for tetanus (r² = 0.95, P < 0.0001) and for diphtheria (r² = 0.93, P < 0.0001) between the in vitro and the in vivo assays. The standardized method is appropriate for evaluating titers of neutralizing antibodies, thus permitting the in vitro control of serum antitoxin levels.

Immunity against diphtheria and tetanus in German blood donors.

After the recent diphtheria epidemics in Eastern Europe in the early 1990s, we re-evaluated the diphtheria and tetanus immunity of 321 German blood donors (192 men and 129 women). The mean antitoxin levels of all blood donors in this study, measured by commercial ELISA, revealed a questionable protection (0.1-1.0 IU/ml) against diphtheria. In 1994, 66.4% were without immunity against diphtheria (55.0% in 1997/98), 32.1% (41.5% in 1997/98) showed questionable protection and only 1.5% (3.5% in 1997/98) had protective antitoxin levels. The evaluation of tetanus immunity revealed only 0.5% (1.1% in 1997/98) of the subjects with no protection and 9.1% (8.5% in 1997/98) with questionable protection. For this reason, we conclude that the diphtheria epidemics only lead to an insufficient improvement of the immunization status in a healthy German population.

[The study of a specific activity of a new allogenic antidiphterial immunoglobulin]. / Vyvchennia spetsyfichnoï antydyfteriinoï aktyvnosti novoho alohennoho imunohlobulinu.

A comparative investigation was conducted of several methods for measuring the activity of the diphterial antitoxin in the preparation of allogenic antidiphterial immunoglobulin. The results of the studies made allow recommending the flocculation reaction and statistical method for use at blood transfusion stations in Ukraine when manufacturing the antidiphterial immunoglobulin, due to their informative, economic value and because they can easily be performed.

Epidemiology of three cases of severe diphtheria in Finnish patients with low antitoxin antibody levels.

During the 1990-1998 diphtheria epidemic in the newly independent states of the former Soviet Union, more than 150,000 infections and 5,000 deaths occurred. During this period, more than 10 million trips were made from Finland to Russia or vice versa. This resulted in only 10 cases of diphtheria in Finland. There was no secondary spread to healthcare workers or other close contacts. Three patients had severe respiratory tract diphtheria. All three were middle-aged men who had made a short visit to Russia, during which time they had intimate contact with local women. These findings suggest diphtheria was transmitted mainly by direct saliva contact. All patients with severe diphtheria had a non-protective level of antitoxin antibodies during the first days of the disease. Only the patient whose antibody titre rose rapidly to a protective level (>1 IU/ml) had an uncomplicated recovery. The other two, one of whom died, had myocarditis and severe polyneuropathy.

European sero-epidemiology network: standardisation of the results of diphtheria antitoxin assays.

A European Sero-Epidemiological Network (ESEN) was established with the aim to co-ordinate and harmonise serological surveillance of immunity to communicable diseases in Europe. In this study the inter-laboratory standardisation of diphtheria toxin antibody measurements is reported. A standard panel of 162 sera was tested by the participating laboratories using an in vitro assay of their choice: VERO cell toxin neutralisation assay (NT), double-antigen delayed time-resolved fluorescence immuno-assay (DA-DELFIA), double-antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (DAE), toxin binding inhibition test (ToBI) and an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The results were standardised using regression against the NT. The variations due to inter-laboratory and inter-assay variation, which would otherwise make it difficult directly to compare the main serum bank results by the different laboratories and the various assays were successfully minimised by the standardisation. The regression equations obtained will be used to transform the respective local results of testing the main serum bank into the reference test unitages. This study also gave the opportunity to compare the various assays within and between laboratories. This demonstrated a very high correlation between DA-DELFIA, DAE, ToBI and the NT. The ELISA showed a good correlation, too, however sera below some 0.1 IU/ml were overestimated.

Immunity to diphtheria in Izmir, Turkey.

In order to assess immunity to diphtheria in Izmir, Turkey, a total of 743 persons 1-70 years of age were selected with cluster sampling. The information on socio-demographic characteristics, vaccination status and diphtheria history was gathered for each participant. Diphtheria antitoxin levels were measured qualitatively by using micro-enzyme immune assay. Of studied population, 79.1% had fully protective antitoxin levels (> or = 0.1 IU/ml). Diphtheria protection rates showed a gradual age-related decrease, reaching minimum in the 30-44 age group, in which 40.2% of these subjects had antibody titre below the full protective level. The diphtheria antitoxin geometric mean titer was highest in the 5-9 year age group (1.05 IU/ml). Then, geometric mean titer decreased with increasing age, and reached the minimum level in the 30-44 age group (0.19 IU/ml). These results suggest that in Izmir, Turkey, full serological protection against diphtheria is only detectable in 60% of the adult population. The enhancement of diphtheria immunity by booster vaccinations in adolescents and adults should be considered in Turkey.

Evaluation of single- and dual antigen delayed fluorescence immunoassay in comparison to an ELISA and the in vivo toxin neutralisation test for detection of diphtheria toxin antibodies.

An evaluation of the delayed fluorescence immunoassay (Delfia) against an ELISA method for determination of diphtheria antitoxin levels in serum was performed. The Delfia was also validated in the in vivo toxin neutralisation test (Txn) in rabbits. Two variants of the Delfia were studied, a single-antigen Delfia (sDelfia) with only the diphtheria toxin included and a dual-antigen Delfia (dDelfia) with tetanus toxoid included for simultaneous detection of antibodies against two antigens. The diphtheria antitoxin cut-off levels in the sDelfia and the dDelfia were 0.004 and 0.002 AU/ml, respectively, which is lower than the internationally accepted level showing any protection against diphtheria (0.01 IU/ml). Both Delfia variants showed good correlation with the ELISA procedure above the ELISA cut-off level of 0.02 AU/ml. Results from samples assayed in the in vivo Txn assay indicated that the low antitoxin levels detected by the Delfia were valid. These results show that the Delfia could be considered as an in vitro reference method for detection of diphtheria antitoxin in seroepidemiological surveys and vaccine studies.

Improved ELISA for determination of anti-diphtheria and/or anti-tetanus antitoxin antibodies in sera.

Double-antigen ELISAs for detection and quantification of anti-tetanus or anti-diphtheria antibodies in serum have been developed. The assays showed good correlations with established toxin neutralizing assays and were functionally specific for IgG antibodies. The double-antigen set-up allows specific antibodies to bind to antigen-coated microtitre wells with one arm and the free arm to bind to biotin-labelled antigen. The amount of antibodies able to bind labelled antigen was assessed by adding enzyme-conjugated streptavidin and colour substrate followed by measurement of the colour using an ELISA reader. The double-antigen principle makes it possible to compare samples of different species on the same plate, permitting the direct use of existing international references of animal or human origin. The double-antigen ELISAs showed a detection limit of 0.00002 IU/ml for both antibodies and were suitable for quantifying antibodies in blood samples collected on filter paper as well as in serum. The assays required no special equipment compared to traditional ELISA.

Diphtheria immunity in Flanders.

A serological survey to determine the immunity to diphtheria in the Flemish population was conducted according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization. Immunity to diphtheria was determined on a randomised, stratified sample (1679 serum samples) from an existing serum bank (4058 serum samples) representative of the Flemish population. All age groups between 0 and 100 years were included. A tissue (Vero cell) culture toxin neutralisation assay was used to measure serum diph-theria antitoxin concentrations. The results showed that 43% of the Flemish population was protected against diphtheria (antitoxin titre, > or = 0.1 IU/ml), while 32% was susceptible (antitoxin titre, < 0.01 IU/ml); for 25%, protection was of limited duration (antitoxin titre, > or = 0.01 IU/ml and < 0.1 IU/ml). The proportion of susceptible subjects showed a significant age-related increase, with the highest values in the 35 to 44 and 45 to 54 age groups (57.9% and 55.5%, respectively). These results emphasise the need for booster immunization of adults.

Adjuvanticity of pGPL-Mc and LRS in the immune responses of monkeys to oral immunization with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids.

Experiments were carried out to examine the adjuvanticity of polar glycopeptidolipids of Mycobacterium chelonae (pGPL-Mc) or the London rocket seed (LRS) when combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids in an oral immunization of the African green monkey. The results showed that none of the monkeys receiving diphtheria and tetanus toxoids combined with 25 mg/kg of pGPL-Mc showed an increase in the the level of diphtheria antitoxin (DA) on the third and sixth weeks following the first and the second immunizations. One monkey from this group responded with increased seroneutralizing antibodies 3 weeks after the third feeding. On the other hand, one monkey, 3 weeks after the first immunization, and three monkeys, 3 weeks after the second and third oral vaccinations, showed an increase in specific anti-diphtheria antibody responses when the toxoids were combined with 25 mg/kg of LRS. The anti-diphtheria antitoxin responses of monkeys receiving diphtheria and tetanus toxoids combined with 50 mg/kg of pGPL-Mc or 50 mg/kg of LRS were significantly enhanced compared to the groups administered 25 mg/kg of the two adjuvants. The increase was observed in four out of five pGPL-Mc administered and in three out of five LRS-receiving monkeys. The results show that pGPL-Mc induced the highest titres of anti-diphtheria antitoxin compared to LRS, whereas the level of anti-diphtheria antitoxin titre of the two monkeys receiving the toxoids alone was less than 0.1 i.u./ml of serum throughout the experiment. According to the statistical analyses, no significant differences were recorded between the diphtheria antitoxin responses of monkeys following the first, second or third administration of LRS-adjuvated diphtheria and tetanus toxoids. However, a significant difference (P < or = 0.05) was observed in the diphtheria antitoxin response between the first and the second immunization of monkeys administered with toxoids adjuvated with 50 mg/kg of pGPL-Mc. The tetanus antitoxin responses of all monkeys were less than 0.1 i.u. of antitoxin per millilitre of serum throughout the study, which is considered not to be protective. However, we have recorded an anti-tetanus antitoxin titre of more than 0.2 i.u./ml of serum in one monkey that received diphtheria and tetanus toxoids combined with 50 mg/kg of pGPL-Mc.

Potency assay of diphtheria antitoxin in vero cell micro-cultures

Se establecieron condiciones para llevar a cabo la titulación de antitoxina diftérica en células Vero (TCC), y comparar los resultados con la prueba intradérmica (TID) tradicionalmente empleada en todo el mundo para determinación de potencia de toxoide diftérico y de antitoxina de uso terapéutico. Los resultados de titulaciones en pruebas intradérmicas y en cultivos celulares mostraron gran repetibilidad y detectabilidad a concentraciones muy bajas de toxina en la prueba de cultivos celulares, así como una correlación satisfactoria en la titulación de antitoxinas preparadas por inmunización con Patrón Internacional de OMS y con antitoxina de uso terapéutico, pero en los sueros de cobayo se observó un título aproximadamente 10 veces menor al de la prueba intradérmica. Se discuten las posibles causas de estas diferencias de títulos. Esta prueba se podrá adoptar en la forma propuesta para determinar potencia de antitoxina diftérica. En la prueba de potencia del toxoide diftérico, se podría usar si el límite de título en los cobayos se ajusta a 0.2 UIAD en lugar de 2.0 UIAD/ml que se emplea actualmente, considerando la equivalencia obtenida entre las dos pruebas y tomando en cuenta una relación 1:10 entre las pruebas TCC y TID

Potency assay of diphtheria antitoxin in Vero cell microcultures.

Laboratory conditions were established for the titration of diphtheria toxin and antitoxin in Vero Cell Cultures (CCT) and a comparison was made with the intradermal test (IDT) as currently used throughout the world. Working dilutions and cut off values were established by reading both the change in color of phenol red used as pH indicator and changes in cell viability in the microscope. CCT shows high reproducibility and higher detectability than IDT in the titration of both WHO Reference Standard and high titer horse antisera. In sera of guinea pigs immunized for potency testing of diphtheria toxoid the titre was approximately 10 times lower than in the IDT. The explanation is a subject of speculation. The Vero cell titration might be adopted as such for titration of diphtheria antitoxin. In the case of the toxoid potency test it could be used if the limit for the titration is adjusted to 0.2 IU considering the equivalence obtained between the two tests, by taking into account a ratio of 1:10 between CCT and IDT.

Comparison of in vivo and in vitro methods for determining unitage of diphtheria antitoxin in adsorbed diphtheria-tetanus (DT) and diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) vaccines.

In view of the current efforts to find a reliable in vitro method which can suitably act as an alternative for determining the potency of the diphtheria component in a combined vaccine, we have analysed experimental batches by the method proposed by WHO [1] i.e. challenge method in guinea pigs. The same batches were also analysed by the alternative antibody induction method as suggested in the Indian Pharmacopoeia (I.P.) [2] which is similar to the old method suggested in the British Pharmacopoeia (B.P.) 1973. As per I.P. the initial part of raising the antibodies remains unaltered but the actual titration of diphtheria antitoxin from the immunised guinea pigs was performed by using the following in vitro methods: a) indirect haemagglutination test using human "O" red blood cells to coat diphtheria toxoid using chromic chloride as the coupling agent [3]; b) toxin neutralisation test using Vero cells [4]; c) a double diffusion technique in agar gel for titration of diphtheria antitoxin [5]. Our findings show clearly that the results of two in vivo methods i.e. Challenge Test, Alternative I.P. Method and the above-mentioned three in vitro methods are comparable and would certainly reduce the number of animals required by making a combination of in vivo and in vitro techniques to give us an assessment of the potency of the vaccine to be tested.

[Granule-accumulation in VERO cells used for determination of antitoxin titration by micro cell culture method: I. Influence of mouse serum].

When the titration of diphtheria antitoxin of mouse serum was carried out by micro cell culture method using VERO cells, a large number of granules were observed in the cells. In order to examine the influence of this phenomenon on the titration of antitoxin, kinetics of the granule-accumulation was investigated. The granule-accumulation occurred in the cells in the culture medium to which either immunized or normal mouse serum was added. The granule-rich cells appeared at the dilution of the serum less than 1:32 and increased in number with the concentration of the serum. After 4 days of incubation 88% of the cells showed granule-accumulation when undiluted serum was added. Besides the mouse serum, those from guinea-pigs, horses, fetal calves and humans were examined. However, intensive accumulation of granules such as shown with mouse serum was not observed. From these results it was suggested that mouse serum might have some unknown mechanism which caused the remarkable accumulation of granules in VERO cells. The nature of granule and influence of this phenomenon on the titration of diphtheria antitoxin will be presented in an accompanying paper.